Well, it's happening. After the violent clashes at the 'culturally carcinogenic' events in Charlottesville, people all over have been either demanding that statues be taken down or have physically taken them down themselves. Of course, since that Charlottesville rally was originally set up to stop a statue of General Robert E. Lee from being torn down, the biggest target of these people has been the many Confederate statues that stand all over America (especially in the southern states of course).
My overall opinion of this movement to take down these statues is that I'm................. torn. Yes, I know. You'd think that a free speech advocate such as myself would be 100% against these statues coming down. I'm basing this point of view on looking at a bigger picture.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69c13/69c133c633b213badaa305794fb8333958c99b0c" alt=""
Another big picture example I'll bring up is the big invasion of Iraq back in 2003. The big signifier that their 'mission had been accomplished' was that a huge statue of Saddam Hussein had been brought down. The same people fighting the hardest to preserve confederate states today, back then had no problem seeing that statue go. There was no cry of "but what about Sunni history?" or "wouldn't Saddam's sons Uday and Qusay be traumatized seeing this image of their father being destroyed?" Just like in Russia, the statue coming down signified that Iraq was no longer under Saddam's iron-fisted rule.
If it were up to me, I would not even demolish those statues just for the sake of preserving the principles of free speech, free expression, and preserving history. However, what's done is done.
I was not present at the induction ceremonies for any of the Confederate statues, so I have no idea what the true intentions were in erecting them in the first place. Maybe some were put up as a desperate attempt for 'proud southerners' to show everyone just who rules that respective county they're in. But some might also have been put up as a way for Americans to never forget any aspect of their history, good or bad.
There's also the matter of freedom of expression for the original artists who made those statues. However, many of the artists I'm sure were simply commissioned to make these. They may not have had any sentimental attachment to figures like Robert E. Lee or Stonewall Jackson. Their sole intent was simply to make some quick money by creating monuments of other people's heroes. So, for that reason, maybe the artists would feel indifferent to their statues coming down. Their attitude might just be "I made my money and people saw me display my talents so ti's all good."
I should also mention that I do not have any affection for the alt-right in any way. One of them called me a "race traitor" for having a Filipina wife.
So, as you can see, I couldn't care less about the hurt feelings of these 'hoodless klansmen' as they watch their heroes come tumbling down.
One big aspect of this movement that i strongly do NOT care for is the mob justice that's tearing down these statues. That is never a positive trend.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cbef/3cbef463b8177eb9db2d8d0c1631a19c0a5ff82e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7d99/c7d99eb81427297fd21a767e33007c5f85856789" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/225f7/225f75055f87fdd3f8a860915790e27921f92439" alt=""
I'll end this post with a bit about a statue that has been stirring up a similar controversy in Canada: the statue of British General Edward Cornwallis. This statue that stands in Halifax has been protested and vandalized many many times, most adamantly by the Miqmaq Indian tribe. Well, he does have a rather brutal history with the Miqmaq for sure. Back in his day (the 1750's), the French were paying the Miqmaq Indians for every British scalp they could get. Cornwallis didn't care for this turn of events of course. However, his solution to this was the completely exterminate every single Miqmaq Indian there was, and he wasted no time in doing so.
But, at the same time, Halifax has to honour him because he is the man who founded that city. It was his leadership that made Halifax the thriving heart of the maritimes that it still is today. So, to balance the good and bad parts of this man's history, city officials have said "this statue simply honours the work he did to make Halifax what it is. We do not honour the full man."
So there you have it. I have presented many different arguments for tearing down, building up, and/or preserving statues. Do with this espousal of postulation what you will.
No comments:
Post a Comment